The Margin: Ban billionaires? Capitalism takes beating at the hands of Teen Vogue and others

Socialism is having a moment. Or at least anti-capitalism is.

According to a 2017 survey from Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, one in two millennials say they would rather live in a socialist or communist country than a capitalist democracy.

Taking it a step further, almost a quarter of them have a favorable view of Karl Marx and, weirdly, a few even see Joseph Stalin and Kim Jong Un as “heroes.”

A recent poll from Gallup similarly showed Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 are more positive about socialism than capitalism. In 2010, 68% viewed capitalism positively. That number has dropped to just 45%.

Here’s a breakdown of the survey:

Lately, as more and more headlines paint the picture of a widening chasm between the rich and the poor and voters rally around progressive candidates like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the rhetoric has really ramped up across the internet.

Enter Teen Vogue. Yes, Teen Vogue.

Amid tweets about Kendall Jenner and silk scrunchies, the Vogue-but-for-teenagers magazine kicked up some buzz with this missive:

While the article linked in the tweet was a less-controversial thumbsucker laying out pros and cons of both socialism and capitalism, the bait was taken and the social-media response was swift.

At least we’re not DENMARK, right?

Teen Vogue wasn’t the only one beating up on the 1%. The rich also got scorched in a GQ piece titled, “Billionaires are the leading cause of climate change,” in which Luke Darby began with, “As the world faces environmental disaster on a biblical scale, it’s important to remember exactly who brought us here.”

Who exactly is that? He threw out names like the Koch brothers, the Exxon XOM, +0.52%  bosses, Las Vegas Sands LVS, -1.92%  honcho Sheldon Adelson, etc..

“The fossil-fuel industry’s interests are too well-insulated by the mountains of cash that have been converted into lobbyists, industry-shilling Republicans and Democrats, and misinformation,” Darby wrote. “To them, the rest of the world is just kindling.”

And finally, the “Hmm Daily” blog took it up a notch with the hottest take of them all, courtesy of former Gawker and Deadspin editor Tom Scocca.

“Billionaires are bad,” he wrote, half-jokingly, or so it seemed. “We should presumptively get rid of billionaires. All of them.”

He wasn’t not talking about revolution. Not the violent kind, anyway. He said billionaires should be allowed to keep living, just not with all that money.

“No one needs a billion dollars. No one deserves a billion dollars,” he explained, pointing out the false belief that billionaires earn their fortunes by adding value to society, and, in the process, just take their rightful piece of the greater good.

“One pictures some great industrialist inventing and manufacturing a useful item, which makes every single person’s life better, and in return receiving a small share of the price of the item,” Scocca wrote. “A kindergarten teacher, teaching 25 new people a year not to bite each other and to work in occasional harmony with strangers, produces far more social good in a lifetime than an industrialist.”

He cited the Forbes rich list, which is “larded with monopolists, retailers, retail monopolists, the heirs of retail monopolies, real estate magnates, Mark Zuckerberg,” for proof of the value-add.

“What do they do with all their extra money? They buy atrocious houses. They shut down publications. They buy politicians, over and under the table,” he wrote. “Now a whole batch of them have moved directly into government — and we have the most corrupt and incompetent executive branch in memory to show for it.”

So, to sum it all up: Billionaires suck, they’re responsible for a lot of bad stuff, like global warming, and we need to get our socialism on. Discuss!

But, hey, good news for the anti-capitalists: The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -1.63%  is down another 300 points.

Be Sociable, Share!

Related Posts


MarketTamer is not an investment advisor and is not registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Further, owners, employees, agents or representatives of MarketTamer are not acting as investment advisors and might not be registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory.

This company makes no representations or warranties concerning the products, practices or procedures of any company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email, and makes no representations or warranties concerning said company or entity’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, regulations promulgated by the SEC or the CFTC. The sender of this email may receive a portion of the proceeds from the sale of any products or services offered by a company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email. The recipient of this email assumes responsibility for conducting its own due diligence on the aforementioned company or entity and assumes full responsibility, and releases the sender from liability, for any purchase or order made from any company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email.

The content on any of MarketTamer websites, products or communication is for educational purposes only. Nothing in its products, services, or communications shall be construed as a solicitation and/or recommendation to buy or sell a security. Trading stocks, options and other securities involves risk. The risk of loss in trading securities can be substantial. The risk involved with trading stocks, options and other securities is not suitable for all investors. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must evaluate his/her own personal financial situation and consider all relevant risk factors. See: Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. The educational training program and software services are provided to improve financial understanding.

The information presented in this site is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decisions, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Nothing in our research constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice. Our research is prepared for general circulation and has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive or obtain access to it. Our research is based on sources that we believe to be reliable. However, we do not make any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of our research, the completeness, or correctness or make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using our research. To the maximum extent permitted by law, neither we, any of our affiliates, nor any other person, shall have any liability whatsoever to any person for any loss or expense, whether direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or otherwise, arising from or relating in any way to any use of or reliance on our research or the information contained therein. Some discussions contain forward looking statements which are based on current expectations and differences can be expected. All of our research, including the estimates, opinions and information contained therein, reflects our judgment as of the publication or other dissemination date of the research and is subject to change without notice. Further, we expressly disclaim any responsibility to update such research. Investing involves substantial risk. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results, and a loss of original capital may occur. No one receiving or accessing our research should make any investment decision without first consulting his or her own personal financial advisor and conducting his or her own research and due diligence, including carefully reviewing any applicable prospectuses, press releases, reports and other public filings of the issuer of any securities being considered. None of the information presented should be construed as an offer to sell or buy any particular security. As always, use your best judgment when investing.