The Halloween Effect – True or False?

It has been a market bromide for decades: “Sell in May and go away.” This piece of market wisdom is sometimes referred to as the Halloween Effect, a strategy for going long on stocks on October 31 and selling the positions on May 1 for a gain. It assumes that, with few exceptions, the November through April period will be more bullish than the May through October period. But is it true?

The Halloween Effect

Actually, it is true. One study done in 1999 extensively reviewed stock market prices in all the world's major markets, and even many minor markets (e.g., Denmark) going back many years. At least since 1970, the data shows that the Nov/Apr period significantly outperforms the May/Oct period in 36 of 37 markets studied. The Halloween Effect is much stronger in some markets than others, and is particularly strong in Europe. The effect is extremely pronounced in the U.K., with evidence for its existence going back to 1694! It is also clearly present in the United States markets, if not quite so strongly. Sven Bouman and Ben Jacobsen, The Halloween Indicator, ‘Sell in May and Go Away’: Another Puzzle (1999).

The figure below, taken from that study, shows the respective returns for the Nov/Apr and May/Oct periods from 1970 through 1998 for many country stock markets, including the United States:

That's pretty compelling evidence! While a particular year may represent an exception, such as 1987 in which a U.S. market crash occurred, the stock market almost always does better in the Nov/Apr half of the year. The study's authors looked at many possible causal factors, such as interest rate fluctuation, people taking summer vacations May/Oct, whether the effect is sector-specific (it isn't), variations in trading volume, seasonal news and the like. None of them remotely accounts for the effect.

While the data is unequivocal and clearly establishes the effect's existence worldwide, what we don't know is WHY it happens; just that it does. And it happens consistently even though it is well known and expected, meaning that arbitrage and trading patterns taking the Halloween Effect into account have not canceled or really even modified it, as one would expect.

Theoretically, the effect's existence is implausible, all the more since no one can ascribe a reason to it. Efficient market theory in particular would predict that the effect actually is impossible. Don't laugh; a scientist once “proved” mathematically that bumblebees cannot fly. Put differently, the chance of finding a Halloween Effect for the Nov/Apr six-month period compared to the May/Oct period is 50%; even odds. But a 50/50 coin-flipping outcome is not what happens in the real world – the effect's consistency and continuity is overwhelming. So much for the random walk theory…

Newsletter author Mark Hulbert recently did his own analysis of the Halloween Effect since 1896 and found that it was not really found in the 1896-1951 period (the above study did not address the effect's existence in the U.S. prior to 1970), though it has been pronounced since. Hulbert suggests that no one can explain why it was present since 1951 but not before that. And right he is. But this is hardly surprising, since no one can explain the effect at all. Yet it occurs in virtually every major and minor market; even in the Southern Hemisphere, where the seasons are reversed and Christmas occurs during their summer time.

Old data, you say?

Check out this chart, courtesy of Benjamin Bohr from BetweentheNumbers.net:

This chart shows two things: 1) Hulbert was right about the Halloween effect not being seen prior to 1951, and 2) the effect is pretty reliable. For some reason, Februaries are weak and Septembers the worst.

What Does the Halloween Effect Mean for Traders?

The Halloween effect does not posit that on average the market will be strong NOV-APR and weak during MAY-OCT. We are talking relative strength here, not absolute. If a period is part of a bull market they may all be good; and vice versa. What the data tells us is that, year in and year out, corrections will tend more to happen MAY—OCT and rallies NOV—APR, on average.

The old saw says to sell in May and go away—but it doesn’t tell you when to buy. Being a contrarian, this tells me that September is (on average) the time to buy stocks or to buy OTM calls to speculate on stock movement. Or view late April/early May as the time to short the market or speculate by purchasing puts. These strategies assume, of course, that the stock itself conforms to the Halloween effect; not all of them do. You sort of want to check this over a 5- or 10-year stock for the chart, comprendez-vous?

If I am writing covered calls, they will do better November—April in general, and OTM call writes in particular will do better then. During the under-performing summer doldrums, stick to great companies outperforming the sucky market at the time, and write ATM calls (highest non-called return of all) or ITM calls, if you are more conservative.

But while putting our faith in the Halloween Effect, let's keep our powder dry. If the market goes into a correction, keep your covered call money in your pocket while looking for great bear call spreads – option trades in which the trader sells a lower-strike call and buys a higher-strike call, generating a credit.

To learn more about how to generate income consistently, click here.

Related Posts

 

MarketTamer is not an investment advisor and is not registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Further, owners, employees, agents or representatives of MarketTamer are not acting as investment advisors and might not be registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory.


This company makes no representations or warranties concerning the products, practices or procedures of any company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email, and makes no representations or warranties concerning said company or entity’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, regulations promulgated by the SEC or the CFTC. The sender of this email may receive a portion of the proceeds from the sale of any products or services offered by a company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email. The recipient of this email assumes responsibility for conducting its own due diligence on the aforementioned company or entity and assumes full responsibility, and releases the sender from liability, for any purchase or order made from any company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email.


The content on any of MarketTamer websites, products or communication is for educational purposes only. Nothing in its products, services, or communications shall be construed as a solicitation and/or recommendation to buy or sell a security. Trading stocks, options and other securities involves risk. The risk of loss in trading securities can be substantial. The risk involved with trading stocks, options and other securities is not suitable for all investors. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must evaluate his/her own personal financial situation and consider all relevant risk factors. See: Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. The www.MarketTamer.com educational training program and software services are provided to improve financial understanding.


The information presented in this site is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decisions, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Nothing in our research constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice. Our research is prepared for general circulation and has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive or obtain access to it. Our research is based on sources that we believe to be reliable. However, we do not make any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of our research, the completeness, or correctness or make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using our research. To the maximum extent permitted by law, neither we, any of our affiliates, nor any other person, shall have any liability whatsoever to any person for any loss or expense, whether direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or otherwise, arising from or relating in any way to any use of or reliance on our research or the information contained therein. Some discussions contain forward looking statements which are based on current expectations and differences can be expected. All of our research, including the estimates, opinions and information contained therein, reflects our judgment as of the publication or other dissemination date of the research and is subject to change without notice. Further, we expressly disclaim any responsibility to update such research. Investing involves substantial risk. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results, and a loss of original capital may occur. No one receiving or accessing our research should make any investment decision without first consulting his or her own personal financial advisor and conducting his or her own research and due diligence, including carefully reviewing any applicable prospectuses, press releases, reports and other public filings of the issuer of any securities being considered. None of the information presented should be construed as an offer to sell or buy any particular security. As always, use your best judgment when investing.