Is It Worth Getting Out of Bed?

For January, is it worth it for traders to even get out of bed?

We certainly have potential. The holidays are over, the kids are back in school, and we're all getting back to work. Traders will be facing the first market open of the year with a set of opinions formulated and refined during the past two weeks.

Reports on Q4 2013 earnings will start coming out next week. Being the start of a new year, surely there will be some news, discussion, and fuss made about the budget, the dollar, the debt, the whatever, as various parties try to influence the direction of laws and public opinion.

Most of these are not new – they are factors every January. So it is reasonable to ponder on how the markets typically perform in January, as they try to respond to all this.

I ran a scan on the list of major indexes and sector ETFs I regularly watch. Many of the ETFs have only 12 or so years of history, and I focused only on the histories since 1980.

On the whole, the track records show little net movement one way or the other. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 both averaged only a 1.2% gain, with gains in almost 65% of the years. But that means there were losses in 35% of the years. The Russell 2000 (RUT), the index of smaller stocks, has hardly any net movement, logging only a 0.5% average, and years with gains equaling years with losses.

The NASDAQ Composite, and QQQ, an ETF based on NASDAQ stocks with a tilt towards technology biotech, and financial areas, show a slightly larger average return and success rate.

One rather odd situation above is with semiconductors. The SOX index averaged a 5.1% gain and a 64.7% success rate, but SMH, an ETF based on semiconductor stocks, averaged only a 0.3% gain and a 53.8% rate. The top holdings and weightings differ between the two, and most likely the sharp gains of just one or two stocks made the difference.

I've never been a fan of presenting seasonal analysis on a specific-date basis, like from January 1st to the 31st. As a trader, I don't think in terms of sitting around for the first of the month, taking a position based solely on a historical track record, and closing the position out at the end of the month.

Another reason is because the day of the week you enter a trade can make as much as a percent-or-two difference in the average net results. In January, the first trading day of the month can fall on any day between Monday and Friday, What difference does that make? A big one.

Say someone told you to enter a QQQ trade on a Monday of this coming week and exit the trade on the Friday close, 19 days later. Since 1990, this trade would have averaged a 2.0% return, with gains in 16 out of 24 years (67%).

But if you instead entered the trade on Tuesday and held it through the Friday close, 18 days later, the average return is 1.8%, with gains in 16 out of 24 years (67%).

If you entered the trade on Wednesday and held it through the Friday close, 17 days later, the average return is only 1.7%, with gains in 12 out of 24 years (50%).

If you entered the trade on Thursday and held it through the Friday close, 16 days later, the average return is only 1.9%, with gains in 14 out of 24 years (58%).

If you entered the trade on Tuesday and held it through the Friday close, 15 days later, the average return is only 1.1%, with gains in 13 out of 24 years (54%).

The day-of-week you enter a trade can make a difference. Duane Davis wrote a book titled ‘Never on Thursday, 26 Little-Known Statistical Facts That Can Make-or-Break You as a Trader'. The focus of his book was almost entirely on the S&P 500 futures. When I extended his analysis to individual stocks and ETFs, I found similar results. As a result, instead of producing seasonal analysis based on one specific date to another, the way most seasonal analysis is presented, I focus on the Monday (or first trading day) of each week of the year, and work out the track records from there.

In case you are wondering if there are individual stocks that do have strong track records for January, I can answer that. For the most part, no. I created a list of the stocks contained within several of the top indexes, the DJIA, the S&P 500, the NASDAQ 100, the S&P mid-cap 400, the S&P 600 small-cap, and so forth. I then filtered out all the stocks that have less than 12 years of history, were too low in price, or had a low average daily volume. That left me with 670 stocks, primarily the better known, actively traded stocks.

I ran the ‘one-month' test – checking each stock's returns over the first trading day in January through the last trading day in January. The results? Very few did much better than a few percent average return or better than a 50-60% success rate. There were at best only a handful that had track records anywhere near worth considering for a trade.

The best one? Parexel International (PRXL). It provides products and services for clinical research. PRXL has averaged a 12.3% return in January, with gains in 16 out of its 18 years (88.9%!)

In case you are wondering if PRXL would make a good bullish trade this January, Parexel does have decent fundamentals. Over the past year, the number of funds holding PRXL has increased from 376 to 445. The stock got pounded down last October when it reported earnings merely meeting the consensus. In early December, PRXL began recovering, as some strong buying came in. On December 12th, a Director of the company apparently felt the stock was a good value, and purchased $200k worth of the stock. The stock has since gained 10%:

Parexel is due to announce earnings around January 29th. PRXL's track record of gains in January could be an indication institutions or larger traders make a bet each year on expectations of a good late-January earnings announcement.

Of course, there's much more you need to know and many more stocks you can capitalize upon each and every day.  To find out more, including the answer to the above question, type in

By Gregg Harris, MarketTamer Chief Technical Strategist

Copyright (C) 2014 Stock & Options Training LLC

Unless indicated otherwise, at the time of this writing, the author has no positions in any of the above-mentioned securities.

Gregg Harris is the Chief Technical Strategist at with extensive experience in the financial sector.

Gregg started out as an Engineer and brings a rigorous thinking to his financial research. Gregg's passion for finance resulted in the creation of a real-time quote system and his work has been featured nationally in publications, such as the Investment Guide magazine.

As an avid researcher, Gregg concentrates on leveraging what institutional and big money players are doing to move the market and create seasonal trend patterns. Using custom research tools, Gregg identifies stocks that are optimal for stock and options traders to exploit these trends and find the tailwinds that can propel stocks to levels that are hidden to the average trader.

Related Posts


MarketTamer is not an investment advisor and is not registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Further, owners, employees, agents or representatives of MarketTamer are not acting as investment advisors and might not be registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory.

This company makes no representations or warranties concerning the products, practices or procedures of any company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email, and makes no representations or warranties concerning said company or entity’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, regulations promulgated by the SEC or the CFTC. The sender of this email may receive a portion of the proceeds from the sale of any products or services offered by a company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email. The recipient of this email assumes responsibility for conducting its own due diligence on the aforementioned company or entity and assumes full responsibility, and releases the sender from liability, for any purchase or order made from any company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email.

The content on any of MarketTamer websites, products or communication is for educational purposes only. Nothing in its products, services, or communications shall be construed as a solicitation and/or recommendation to buy or sell a security. Trading stocks, options and other securities involves risk. The risk of loss in trading securities can be substantial. The risk involved with trading stocks, options and other securities is not suitable for all investors. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must evaluate his/her own personal financial situation and consider all relevant risk factors. See: Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. The educational training program and software services are provided to improve financial understanding.

The information presented in this site is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decisions, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Nothing in our research constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice. Our research is prepared for general circulation and has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive or obtain access to it. Our research is based on sources that we believe to be reliable. However, we do not make any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of our research, the completeness, or correctness or make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using our research. To the maximum extent permitted by law, neither we, any of our affiliates, nor any other person, shall have any liability whatsoever to any person for any loss or expense, whether direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or otherwise, arising from or relating in any way to any use of or reliance on our research or the information contained therein. Some discussions contain forward looking statements which are based on current expectations and differences can be expected. All of our research, including the estimates, opinions and information contained therein, reflects our judgment as of the publication or other dissemination date of the research and is subject to change without notice. Further, we expressly disclaim any responsibility to update such research. Investing involves substantial risk. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results, and a loss of original capital may occur. No one receiving or accessing our research should make any investment decision without first consulting his or her own personal financial advisor and conducting his or her own research and due diligence, including carefully reviewing any applicable prospectuses, press releases, reports and other public filings of the issuer of any securities being considered. None of the information presented should be construed as an offer to sell or buy any particular security. As always, use your best judgment when investing.