Capitol Report: Trump administration reverses stance on obscure tax provision that could have cost $700 million

This post was originally published on this site

The Trump administration has reversed itself on an unusual tax provision that could have cost Corporate America more than $700 million.

Refunds tied to corporate alternative minimum tax credits were on track for so-called sequester cuts of about 6%, so insurers and other companies last year lobbied the Office of Management and Budget to stop the reductions.

It was an obscure battle since the sweeping Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 had repealed the corporate AMT anyway.

Following the pushback, the Internal Revenue Service said that certain AMT refund payments and related transactions “will not be subject to sequestration.”

Many players in property-and-casualty insurance are “generally satisfied” with this announcement from the IRS, said Jon Bergner, assistant vice president of federal policy for the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies. Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. HIG, +1.18%  , whose businesses include property and casualty insurance, has been among the companies with the biggest AMT credits, and the Tax Policy Center has said insurance has been the industry most affected by the corporate AMT historically.

Sheryl Vander Baan, a tax partner at accounting firm Crowe LLP, said the decision makes sense.

“It’s not as if you had a choice of saying, ‘Well, listen, I don’t want to take an AMT refund. I’ll just let my AMT credits roll forward,’” she told MarketWatch. “Taxpayers don’t have a choice of that.”

Not all companies are happy with the move, however, including household names like General Motors Co. and T-Mobile USA Inc. In its announcement in mid-January, the IRS said corporations that had previously claimed the refundable credits still were subject to sequester reductions.

That refers to companies that had opted for AMT credits instead of claiming bonus depreciation on certain qualified property, Vander Baan said.

The different treatment for companies in this camp makes sense, according to the Crowe expert. “The distinction is that getting an AMT refund under 168(k)(4) was completely their option,” she told MarketWatch, referring to the specific part of the tax code. “It was a choice. You didn’t have to elect it.”

But companies in this camp that have formed an “AMT Refund Coalition” don’t see it that way. GM GM, +1.20%   , Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. GT, -0.86%   , T-Mobile TMUS, +1.23%  , miner Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. CLF, +0.52%  and packaging producer Owens-Illinois Inc. OI, +1.47%  are in this coalition.

“This is really an issue of tax fairness,” said Greg Nickerson, a Washington Tax & Public Policy Group lobbyist who heads the group, in a statement. “It just doesn’t make any sense for the government to treat some taxpayers differently than others, when the only difference is that some companies decided to invest real capital in the U.S. economy in the time and method provided to them by Congress.”

About 540 companies disclosed AMT credits from April 2017 through March 2018 in 10-Ks, according to data from research firm Audit Analytics. Their credits were worth a total of at least $11.2 billion, and trimming 6.6% from that total would have amounted to a reduction of $739 million.

Even as the overall pain for Corporate America due to this issue has decreased sharply, those companies still subject sequester cuts look on track for a hit.

For example, T-Mobile — which is part of the coalition of companies that is still subject to the reductions — had disclosed AMT credits of $86 million, the Audit Analytics data show, so the wireless carrier could face a reduction of more $5 million.

Be Sociable, Share!

Related Posts


MarketTamer is not an investment advisor and is not registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Further, owners, employees, agents or representatives of MarketTamer are not acting as investment advisors and might not be registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory.

This company makes no representations or warranties concerning the products, practices or procedures of any company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email, and makes no representations or warranties concerning said company or entity’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, regulations promulgated by the SEC or the CFTC. The sender of this email may receive a portion of the proceeds from the sale of any products or services offered by a company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email. The recipient of this email assumes responsibility for conducting its own due diligence on the aforementioned company or entity and assumes full responsibility, and releases the sender from liability, for any purchase or order made from any company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email.

The content on any of MarketTamer websites, products or communication is for educational purposes only. Nothing in its products, services, or communications shall be construed as a solicitation and/or recommendation to buy or sell a security. Trading stocks, options and other securities involves risk. The risk of loss in trading securities can be substantial. The risk involved with trading stocks, options and other securities is not suitable for all investors. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must evaluate his/her own personal financial situation and consider all relevant risk factors. See: Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. The educational training program and software services are provided to improve financial understanding.

The information presented in this site is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decisions, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Nothing in our research constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice. Our research is prepared for general circulation and has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive or obtain access to it. Our research is based on sources that we believe to be reliable. However, we do not make any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of our research, the completeness, or correctness or make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using our research. To the maximum extent permitted by law, neither we, any of our affiliates, nor any other person, shall have any liability whatsoever to any person for any loss or expense, whether direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or otherwise, arising from or relating in any way to any use of or reliance on our research or the information contained therein. Some discussions contain forward looking statements which are based on current expectations and differences can be expected. All of our research, including the estimates, opinions and information contained therein, reflects our judgment as of the publication or other dissemination date of the research and is subject to change without notice. Further, we expressly disclaim any responsibility to update such research. Investing involves substantial risk. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results, and a loss of original capital may occur. No one receiving or accessing our research should make any investment decision without first consulting his or her own personal financial advisor and conducting his or her own research and due diligence, including carefully reviewing any applicable prospectuses, press releases, reports and other public filings of the issuer of any securities being considered. None of the information presented should be construed as an offer to sell or buy any particular security. As always, use your best judgment when investing.