Capitol Report: The ‘Green New Deal’ isn’t really that new

This post was originally published on this site
Getty Images

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey speak during a press conference to announce Green New Deal legislation on Feb. 7, 2019.

The “Green New Deal” isn’t actually that new.

Released last week by New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Massachusetts Sen. Edward Markey, the much-ballyhooed plan to combat climate change and create jobs has some broad goals in common with an identically named blueprint that Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein ran on in 2012 and again in 2016.

Stein herself said as much on Twitter on Feb. 7, and said credit was actually due to her party’s Howie Hawkins, who ran for governor of New York on such a platform in 2010.

Here’s a look at some key similarities and differences between Stein’s plan (using the 2016 version) and the nonbinding resolution offered by Ocasio-Cortez and Markey last week.

2030 goals: Stein’s plan calls for shifting the economy to “100% clean, renewable energy by 2030,” while the Ocasio-Cortez/Markey version aims to eliminate the U.S. carbon footprint by 2030. That’s similar enough, but differs in that Stein explicitly calls for “a complete phase out of fossil fuels.” The Democrats’ version calls for meeting 100% of power through clean sources, but doesn’t contain the phase-out language.

Read: Democrats’ ‘Green New Deal’ to eliminate U.S. carbon footprint by 2030.

Getty Images

Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein speaks at a news conference on Fifth Avenue across the street from Trump Tower, on Dec. 5, 2016 in New York City.

Jobs guarantee: Both plans contain a jobs guarantee. In the Democrats’ case, the goal is a “family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations, and retirement security to all people of the United States.” Stein’s version offers a target of 20 million jobs but the Ocasio-Cortez/Markey plan says only “millions.”

Carbon tax: A carbon tax is notably absent from the Democrats’ Green New Deal. Stein’s plan embraced it, saying such a levy is “the most efficient means to instill crucial price signals that spur carbon-reducing investment.”

Nuclear power: Also absent from the Democrats’ Green New Deal: mention of nuclear power. That’s a key difference from Stein’s, which calls for getting rid of it. “The resolution is silent on any individual technology,” Markey said at a news conference unveiling the bill. The language allowing possible room for nuclear power reportedly reflected concerns from labor groups, including those with members who work in the nuclear-energy industry.

Also see: As vague as it is, the Green New Deal could have a real impact on Corporate America. Here’s why.

Health care: Both plans broadly address human health, with a goal of the Ocasio-Cortez/Markey plan providing all Americans with “high-quality health care.” Stein’s version claims that health-care costs will go down under her plan since things like clean energy and healthy food are “the foundations of human health.”

Now read: Pelosi calls Ocasio-Cortez’s ‘new deal’ climate plan a ‘green dream.’

Be Sociable, Share!

Related Posts


MarketTamer is not an investment advisor and is not registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Further, owners, employees, agents or representatives of MarketTamer are not acting as investment advisors and might not be registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory.

This company makes no representations or warranties concerning the products, practices or procedures of any company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email, and makes no representations or warranties concerning said company or entity’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, regulations promulgated by the SEC or the CFTC. The sender of this email may receive a portion of the proceeds from the sale of any products or services offered by a company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email. The recipient of this email assumes responsibility for conducting its own due diligence on the aforementioned company or entity and assumes full responsibility, and releases the sender from liability, for any purchase or order made from any company or entity mentioned or recommended in this email.

The content on any of MarketTamer websites, products or communication is for educational purposes only. Nothing in its products, services, or communications shall be construed as a solicitation and/or recommendation to buy or sell a security. Trading stocks, options and other securities involves risk. The risk of loss in trading securities can be substantial. The risk involved with trading stocks, options and other securities is not suitable for all investors. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must evaluate his/her own personal financial situation and consider all relevant risk factors. See: Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. The educational training program and software services are provided to improve financial understanding.

The information presented in this site is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decisions, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Nothing in our research constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice. Our research is prepared for general circulation and has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive or obtain access to it. Our research is based on sources that we believe to be reliable. However, we do not make any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of our research, the completeness, or correctness or make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using our research. To the maximum extent permitted by law, neither we, any of our affiliates, nor any other person, shall have any liability whatsoever to any person for any loss or expense, whether direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or otherwise, arising from or relating in any way to any use of or reliance on our research or the information contained therein. Some discussions contain forward looking statements which are based on current expectations and differences can be expected. All of our research, including the estimates, opinions and information contained therein, reflects our judgment as of the publication or other dissemination date of the research and is subject to change without notice. Further, we expressly disclaim any responsibility to update such research. Investing involves substantial risk. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results, and a loss of original capital may occur. No one receiving or accessing our research should make any investment decision without first consulting his or her own personal financial advisor and conducting his or her own research and due diligence, including carefully reviewing any applicable prospectuses, press releases, reports and other public filings of the issuer of any securities being considered. None of the information presented should be construed as an offer to sell or buy any particular security. As always, use your best judgment when investing.